Sturmgeschütz
III Assault Gun 1940-42, Hilary Doyle & Tom Jentz, illustrated by Peter
Sarson, Osprey New Vanguard no 19, first published 1996, 48 pages.
Do
you want to know everything about the early StuG III? Well, you will find some
things of interest here, but I’m not sure if it is enough to warrant a
purchase.
The
book covers the Ausf. A to E, that is, the StuG:s armed with the short 75 mm L/24
gun. The later variants, with the longer (L/43 and later L/48) 75mm anti-tank gun
is missing, but the title gives that away in a sense, since the Ausf. F entered
production in the spring of 42.
It
begins with a rather interesting chapter on Design and Development followed by
one on Product Modifications. The latter chapter specifies the differences
between the different variants, and has 1:76th scale drawings of all
Ausf. Sadly only one of the drawings has side, top-down, front and back views,
the others only get one or two views. One problem also, is the fact that 1:76
is rather tiny when you want to study details.
After
this a very short chapter on Production History, followed by one on
Capabilities, mainly covering its firepower.
So
far so good, but the following chapters, on Operational History and Tactical
Employment were rather disappointing, as they only contain excerpts from a
manual called Instructions for the employment of Sturmartillerie. Just
excerpts, nothing more, no analyses, nothing. Very disappointing. To be frank,
one diagram was interesting, namely one that identifies the vulnerable zones on
some of the allied tanks.
The
chapter Organisation starts rather well, with interesting organisation on
command vehicles etc. Then comes a couple of action reports, from France and Russia,
which consists of original combat reports. Here, as above, nothing more, no
analyses, nothing. I expected more.
Finally,
as usual in Ospreys, you’ll get some colour plates, in this case eight pages in
total, where one two-page spread is a cut-away view of a StuG and its interior.
The latter was very informative, the others where, well, okay.
So,
all in all, I wasn’t impressed. Some of it was interesting, but I think I could
find it in my private library already. Other pieces were less so. I think that the internet can supplant books like this, if they don't provide more of expert knowledge.
My
rating… I’m afraid I can’t give it more than a 2 out of 5 rating. Mostly disappointing.
No comments:
Post a Comment